Yes. Because a lot of the things we pursue don’t really matter that much after all.
I don’t give up on family; I don’t give up on people. I don’t give up on myself becoming the best version that I can be.
But I start a lot of projects, and I’ve quit and given up on lots of them and it was for the best.
In ninth grade, I sat on the bench of the ninth grade team. I didn’t quit that team because I wasn’t supposed to quit–but sometimes I wonder if it would have been better if I had just walked out and done something better with my time. I never played on a basketball team after that bad experience, but that worked out really well for me, as the girl’s basketball team in my high school was plagued with drama and problems.
There are the wrong reasons to quit, like being afraid or being lazy. But there are good reasons to let go of something: sometimes dreams are impossible or messy or ugly, and we need to protect ourselves and the ones we love.
When we start something, we don’t always know what’s going to happen, and when we find out more information or things go wrong, it can be good to get to a better place.
cease to sleep longer than is needful; retire to thy bed early, that ye may not be weary; arise early, that your bodies and your minds may be invigorated.
Doctrine & Covenants 88:124
Sleep schedules will vary from person to person and not everyone needs the same amount of sleep at the same time.
But it is best to have a consistent sleep schedule. Our bodies are also wired to go to sleep when it’s dark outside and to be awake when it’s light.
And adults need 7-9 hours a night.
For me personally, I don’t like staying up any later than 11:00, and usually I’m wasting time if I’m staying up past 10:00 or 10:30. I can’t consistently wake up earlier than 6:00 in the morning.
I know I need at least 7.5 hours of sleep to function, but I don’t need anymore than 8.5 hours. So I should at least go to sleep between 9:30 and 11:00 and wake up between 6 and 6:30. Optimally, I would go to sleep more towards 9:30 or 10:00 than 11:00.
How did we put a man on the moon? We created a government organization that employed extremely talented people that worked together in teams solving small problem after small problem until they figured out how to do it.
The Open-Source Crowd
How did we get a general, somewhat reliable source of information about just about anything on the internet? Someone decided that if there was an open encyclopedia that anyone could edit, eventually there would be quality articles written by professionals and experts. And so Wikipedia exists, and while it’s not reliable, it is still about the best place to go for background information on just about any topic. Writers and editors don’t get paid; people just put their heads together try to create something accurate and useful.
How do we figure out how to execute monetary policy? There were a bunch of intellectual people who started to think and publish papers and books and in all that discussion, came up with some macroeconomic models that are used to determine how to set interest rates and control money supply.
How do we make sure that everyone can eat? People created food banks that give out free food to people who need it. Backed by donations and supported by volunteers, food banks use the kindness of others in order to help.
How do we communicate better with each other? Tech companies, working for a profit, created and improved email, online chats, video conference social networks, and more.
There are lots of ways to solve problems, and one way is not necessarily better than another. It depends on the problem, and many different organizations and systems can work together in order to create a better world.
I don’t really want to cook that much when I’m camping: all I want to bring is a camp stove, a skillet, and a small pot, and it better be ready in around 20 minutes or less. I more want to assemble things together and still have something nice to eat. The food also had to be able to be cooked if there is a fire ban and fires aren’t allowed, and it’s preferable to not use a cooler as much as possible.
Precooked sausage and bacon
Pack lunch meat, cheese, veggies, fruit, crackers, chips, bread, tortillas, peanut butter & jelly, etc., and then assemble them together in different ways to eat lunch. So you can have salad, sandwiches, wraps, lunchables, etc.
Hot dogs and beans
Asian chicken salad (cabbage, canned chicken, mandarin oranges, crunch noodles)
Nachos (with canned cheese sauce)
Chili and chips
Soup from a can (beef stew, whatever)
Tacos and taco salad (meat made ahead or just use canned chili)
Chili in a bag of chips with toppings
Macaroni and cheese
Ramen noodles and frozen veggies (with eggs if you would like)
Tuna sandwiches/tuna salad
Black bean salad
S’mores (cook marshmallow on stove if fire isn’t available)
I’ve been diving a bit into infinity with this online class. Part of trying to understand this is realizing that I’ve held certain concepts in my head there were wrong.
I had this idea that infinity is the biggest you can get to. But that’s not really what infinity is. If I have an infinite amount of natural number (1,2,3,4,5 . . . ), I still have constraints of what that infinity means. There is an infinite amount of natural numbers, yes. But I’m still just dealing with natural numbers.
There are also an infinite amount of rational numbers (think fractions/decimals) between 0 and 1.
Some infinities are bigger than other infinities. You can compare infinities by doing a bijection of one set to another. If you can connect each entry in one set to a corresponding entry in another set and vice versa, then the sets are the same size. To prove whether infinities are the same or different size, you just have to create a rule or process to form a bijection.
If I have infinite rational numbers, then this is bigger than infinite natural numbers. I can count infinite natural numbers. But infinities do not have to be countable.
There is a diagonal proof that basically says this: try to write a list of all the rational numbers in decimal form. Now take the first digit of the first number and change that digit. Then take the second digit of the second number and change that. The third number, change the third digit. And if you keep changing the digits on for infinity, then the number you end up with will not be on your list. Thus, the rational numbers are not countable and are bigger than the set of natural numbers.
There are also an infinite amount of infinities that are larger and larger than another.
I had a concept of infinity that was incorrect. But it was useful to me, until I wanted to learn more and I had to change what I thought.
Instead of trying to determine the decision with the best results, view life more as an experiment, where the results are unknown and you just have to go for it.
You will choose food that doesn’t taste good and activities that aren’t worth the time and money. You will waste time and effort and energy in choosing something that is not optimal. This will happen no matter how much you try to make the right decision, because you simple don’t have all the options available to you right away.
View decisions as an ability to learn: choose a good option, and then learn if it’s right or wrong for you while you are doing it.
Be patient. Large decisions can take time, and that’s okay. Don’t force yourself to make important decisions you aren’t ready for.
Stop trying to maximize the value you get for your money, and instead just call something good enough.
Set limits, like only looking at the first page of search results when shopping online or only looking in a single store. Purposefully narrow your options so that the decision becomes easier.
Let someone else make unimportant decisions, or decide by default.
Make decisions ahead of time instead of making them in the moment.
Have a fallback that you go to when you can’t decide.
Pretend you are making a decision for someone else.